← All projects

Agentic systems / Sep 2026

FactorForge

Agentic quantitative research & backtesting

Turns investment ideas into literature searches, hypotheses, factor strategies, controlled backtests, and inspectable experiment lineage.

  • Python
  • LangGraph
  • Polars
  • MLflow
  • Neo4j
  • PyTorch
30,000+historical data records
45signal-and-cost cases
46 → 18 minaverage research runtime

Architecture & evidence

Architecture

FactorForge architecture showing its documented processing paths.
Selected architecture paths redrawn from the public project README.

Repository walkthrough

Original research-journey walkthrough published in the FactorForge repository.

The problem

Quantitative research needs more than generated strategies: it needs controlled execution, cost-aware validation, and a record of successful and failed experiments.

System architecture

Natural-language investment ideas become literature, hypotheses, hybrid factor strategies, sandboxed backtests, and iterative decisions through a deterministic execution engine.

Evaluation

Validation combines multi-paper synthesis, walk-forward and purged splits, transaction-cost modeling, and statistical robustness checks across 15 price-based signals and three cost settings.

Execution evidence

A reference backtest matches independent LEAN execution across 40+ portfolio valuations and 15+ trade fills, including fees. Research trajectories preserve prompts, data, code, and backtest lineage.

What I built

  • Built an autonomous quantitative-research system that turned natural-language investment ideas into relevant literature, structured hypotheses, hybrid factor strategies, sandboxed backtests, and iterative research decisions, backed by a deterministic execution engine exercised across 45 historical signal-and-cost cases covering 30,000+ historical data records.
  • Developed a validation pipeline with multi-paper synthesis, walk-forward and purged validation splits, transaction-cost modeling, and statistical robustness checks to evaluate published-factor reproduction and factor-spec extraction accuracy across 15 price-based signals across 3 cost settings achieving 100% agreement across 40+ portfolio valuations and 15+ trade fills—including fees against independent LEAN execution of a reference backtest.
  • Recorded successful and failed experiments as reusable research memory and training trajectories, preserving 100% of prompts, datasets, code, backtests, and experiment lineage, verifying linked research artifacts, tracing 1,200+ agent/tool spans, and reducing average research runtime from 46 min to 18 min at $0.84 average LLM cost per research run.

Explore the implementation

Source code, setup instructions, and project documentation are available in the repository.

CHINMAY / NAVIGATOR

No destinations match “”.

Try a project name, “research”, or a technology like “PyTorch”.

0 destinations found.

navigate · Home / End open · Esc close